<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Econ4U.org &#187; Grocery Store</title>
	<atom:link href="http://econ4u.org/blog/tag/grocery-store/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://econ4u.org/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 22:46:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Price Fixing: Why AT&amp;T is Fixin&#8217; for a Fight</title>
		<link>http://econ4u.org/blog/2009/10/22/price-fixing-why-att-is-fixin-for-a-fight/</link>
		<comments>http://econ4u.org/blog/2009/10/22/price-fixing-why-att-is-fixin-for-a-fight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Market Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Econ4U]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grocery Store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LCD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Price Fixing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[televisions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://econ4u.org/blog/?p=1342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the news today is AT&#38;T’s decision to sue a number of major producers of liquid crystal displays (LCDs). These ubiquitous displays are used in televisions, cell phones, and &#8211; most likely &#8211; the computer screen you’re using right now. AT&#38;T is alleging something called “price fixing” in the market to buy and sell these [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1343" title="Cowboy" src="http://econ4u.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/Cowboy.jpg" alt="Cowboy" width="239" height="324" /></p>
<p>In the news today is <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704597704574487203742926492.html" target="_blank">AT&amp;T’s decision</a> to sue a number of major producers of liquid crystal displays (LCDs). These ubiquitous displays are used in televisions, cell phones, and &#8211; most likely &#8211; the computer screen you’re using right now.</p>
<p>AT&amp;T is alleging something called “price fixing” in the market to buy and sell these displays. So, why are they so upset about this?</p>
<p>For starters, price fixing is illegal in the US; breaking the law is almost always a good reason to get upset. However, regardless of legality, the higher prices it creates are bad for both big corporate consumers like AT&amp;T, and individual consumers like you. Let’s look at an example.</p>
<p>Imagine there are two grocery stores in your hometown; Greg’s Groceries and Sheila’s Shop. Greg and Sheila compete for your business by researching each others prices, and then advertising sales that compare those prices – for instance, &#8211; “Buy Bananas at Sheila’s for 19 cents a pound! Compare to 29 cents per pound at Greg’s.” This is good for you, because each week you can shop at the store with the lowest banana price.</p>
<p>Now, let’s say Greg and Sheila get tired of receiving such a low price for bananas. So, they agree to both sell bananas at 49 cents a pound. This is price-fixing, and it’s bad for you because it means you’re paying more for bananas than you otherwise should be.</p>
<p>This brings us back to AT&amp;T.</p>
<p>At some point, LCD panels likely fetched high prices; however, as the technology became less expensive, and more producers moved in to the market, prices decreased. LCD panel producers like Samsung and LG – our real-life Greg and Sheila – decided they didn’t like this one bit. In response, they allegedly decided to fix the price of LCDs, such that everyone who sells them would charge similarly high prices.</p>
<p>This didn’t sit well with AT&amp;T, who had purchased 300 million mobile phone units with these pricey LCD displays. And it shouldn’t sit well with you, either, because the high price AT&amp;T paid for the phones is eventually passed on to you.</p>
<p>As you might imagine, consumers rarely support higher fixed prices; who wants to pay more for anything? However, people will occasionally take leave of their common sense and support lower fixed prices. As we’ll see in a future blog post, these ideas may seem nice in theory, but they can have disastrous economic consequences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://econ4u.org/blog/2009/10/22/price-fixing-why-att-is-fixin-for-a-fight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

